This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Fri Mar 10 16:01:38 CET 2023
Michele Neylon - Blacknight via members-discuss wrote on 10/03/2023 11:42: > Sure – there are **some** big companies that have huge IP allocations, > but there are also a lot of entities that have fairly large IP blocks > but who aren’t awash with cash. it's also worth pointing out that if the RIPE NCC were to move to a model of billing per IP address, then it would change from a membership based association to a sale-of-services company, and if I remember correctly from previous discussions on the topic, this revenue would likely be liable to dutch corporation tax. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]