[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lennart Seitz
mail at lseitz.de
Mon Apr 17 18:46:38 CEST 2023
Although i find this idea interesting, this would IMHO just lead to fake inetnum records in the DB to avoid the costs. Regards, Lennart On 14.04.2023 17:27, Paul Lewis wrote: > > I'd like to also say that I think the idea of having model A based on > the number of resources used, instead of fixed categories, would be > better. It would help encourage unused resources to be transferred or > returned. > > --- > > Regards, > Paul Lewis. > > > On 2023-04-13 19:02, cowmedia.de wrote: > >> Hi Simon, >> >> by reading this email and checking the calculator again I have the >> feeling >> that the "listening to the members" as you say was not happening. A >> majority >> of the members want a usage based charging scheme (as per the >> discussions on >> this mailing list) and this is completely not reflected. Just adding some >> more categories with the highest still only arround 10K is not >> sufficient. >> >> Also what I do not understand is that my personal account with more >> or less >> one of the lowest resources you can get is already in Category 2?!? >> >> I can just repeat what I have already done: >> >> It should be billed by real resources used and directly calculated not >> within categories >> Smaller LIRs should pay less and bigger LIRs should pay more >> It is important that there is an incentive to get rid of unused resources >> and bring them back, this is only possible when you pay for every >> resource >> separate, otherwise no-one will take care. >> >> I think this 3 models are not ready for vote and need to be revised. >> Also Model 3 I completely do not understand. Why should someone pay for >> transfers? This just means changes are going on and something >> happens. Why >> these companies should then pay more? The "bad" companies are the >> ones that >> do not implement IPv6 and their development just stall so nothing >> happens. >> >> Michael >> >>> On Apr 12, 2023, at 09:45, Simon-Jan Haytink <simonjh at ripe.net >>> <mailto:simonjh at ripe.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear RIPE NCC members, >>> >>> I want to thank all those who contributed to the consultation so far on >> the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024 and the model we should use for the >> coming >> years. >>> >>> We can now share three draft models that we developed based on input >>> from >> the members on the Members Discuss mailing list and in the Charging >> Scheme >> Open House, as well as from the discussions at the recent Executive Board >> Meeting. >>> >>> The result is that we are proposing three draft charging scheme models: >> one category-based and two that are based on the previous "one LIR >> account, >> one fee" model. We hope to receive feedback on these models by 19 >> April so >> the Executive Board can propose the final versions on 26 April. The >> members >> will then vote on those three models at the upcoming General Meeting on >> 24-26 May. >>> >>> The three models all aim to fulfil a budget that is roughly the same as >> 2023 plus general cost increases including inflation, so EUR 42-45 >> million. >> By doing this, we can ensure that we can meet the potential budgetary >> requirements for 2024 while retaining the option for members to >> redistribute >> any excess contributions should we receive excess funds. The Activity >> Plan >> and Budget will be discussed with members this coming Autumn. >>> >>> The three models are available to review at: >>> >> https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/member-and-community-consultations/cha >> rging-scheme-2024-consultation >>> >>> We also provide an updated calculator where members can see for >>> themselves >> how much they might pay under the draft >> models:https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/member-and-community-consultations/new >> -calculator-charging-scheme-2024.xlsx >>> >>> To summarise the main features of the three models: >>> >>> Model A - Category Model >>> >>> This model has ten categories to provide greater granularity. It also >> charges separately for independent and legacy resources in exactly >> the same >> way as in previous years. Additionally, a separate 50 EUR ASN >> assignment fee >> has been added. Both separately charged resources do not contribute >> to the >> category scores. This means there is no double charging and no specific >> charging for transfers or administrative work carried out by the RIPE >> NCC. >> There is a New /24 IPv4 administration fee to ensure there is a financial >> consequence to joining the IPv4 Waiting List. The fee would be >> payable upon >> receipt of the /24, and members joining the waiting list who do not >> have an >> eligible LIR account, would pay the new LIR sign-up fee to open a new LIR >> account and join the waiting list. >>> >>> With this model, approximately 68% of members would pay less than the >> current annual fee, with the remaining 32% paying more. >>> >>> The discussion with members helped us to see that a category-based model >> would receive significant support from members if the version was >> simplified. Should members see the need to charge for other elements, >> then >> that can be incorporated into the category model in the coming years. Any >> such additional charges could potentially then reduce the fees per >> category. >>> >>> Model B - Price increase and ASN fee >>> >>> This model is the exact same as in the previous ten years, but there >>> is a >> price increase of EUR 150 and a 50 EUR ASN fee to ensure we can meet our >> budgetary requirements while retaining the option for members to >> redistribute any excess contribution should we receive excess funds. >>> >>> Model C - Transfer fee and ASN fee >>> >>> This model is the exact same as in the previous ten years, but there >>> is a >> charge of EUR 1,000 per transfer to be paid by the receiving party >> and a 50 >> EUR ASN fee to ensure we can meet our budgetary requirements while >> retaining >> the option for members to redistribute any excess contribution should we >> receive excess funds. >>> >>> Further information on the charging scheme models is provided at: >>> >> https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/member-and-community-consultations/cha >> rging-scheme-2024-consultation/ >>> >>> The RIPE NCC Executive Board believes that a category-based model is the >> best option to help address uncertainty that might be caused by >> consolidation with multiple LIRs and to provide greater flexibility and >> fairness in how we charge members in the coming years. >>> >>> On 26 April, the final versions of the charging schemes that members >>> will >> vote on will be published for the members to consider and discuss. If you >> have comments on the draft charging schemes, we therefore ask you to >> comment >> on the members-discuss mailing list by 19 April so we have time to >> incorporate any feedback if necessary. >>> >>> Importantly, we ask all members to register for the RIPE NCC General >> Meeting where the final decision will be in your hands. Register to >> participate and vote at: >>> https://my.ripe.net/#/meetings/active >>> >>> Simon-Jan Haytink >>> Chief Financial Officer >>> RIPE NCC >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net <mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net> >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >> Unsubscribe: >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/info%40cowmedia.de >> >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net <mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net> >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >> Unsubscribe: >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/paul.lewis%40fr89.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mail%40lseitz.de -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Lennart Seitz PGP-Schlüssel: 0x187abd76a5660379 (https://pgp.lseitz.de/key.asc) -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230417/6977badb/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Publication of Draft Charging Scheme Models 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]