This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Registry Services Ticket Response Time
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Registry Services Ticket Response Time
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Ticketing System / Roadmaps
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Daniel Velea
elvis at v4escrow.net
Tue Sep 14 13:18:15 CEST 2021
Dear Roman, On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:51 <rk at indyntech.com> wrote: > > How come that the old good 1 day SLA has been discontinued and the RIPE > NCC can now simply ignore their members for weeks? Why ticket #398137 that > was submitted by Elvis later was processed earlier and our ticket is still > stored with an unknown status? What is the current SLA and who is > responsible for it? If the management does not cope with this task why is > the executive board not notified of this problem and the issue is not > widely discussed with the community? > As a former RIPE NCC IPRA, I have a great understanding of the processes and procedures the RIPE NCC RS Dept. follows and even if from time to time they update these processes, it only takes one ticket for me to understand the change and adopt it in my processes for all future tickets. Because of my experience, all the tickets I open or ask my customers to open contain complete details and all the information the RIPE NCC needs to approve a ticket without the need to send more questions and, thus, delay the resolution of a ticket. That is why their first reply (if we don’t count the automatic messages saying they have failed to evaluate the request within the SLA), although 4 days late, was an approval.. because the NCC had no reason to ask any questions. Almost 99% of the tickets I am involved with are transfer requests. The requests involve the processing and evaluation of two (sets of) company registration documents (one for each party) and a transfer agreement for which the RIPE NCC has a standard template which we use. So, I am furious to see that even though we make sure our customers provide complete documentation, the NCC still delays their tickets unnecessarily. To be honest, I really never understood why the NCC requires copies of company registration documents from its members for EVERY transfer request (even from members that have provided the very same document days or weeks before) but I believe that’s a discussion we should have at a later time. The bureaucracy at the NCC has reached extraordinary levels if a simple transfer request that requires an IPRA to look at ~3 documents needs several working days for a resolution. This is the frustrating part. Elvis PS: I see the board has had meetings recently but the only thing they were bothered to discuss was the AfriNIC situation. I am hoping that the Board will look at the situation in the RS department and update us on why they have not even discussed this situation yet, although it’s been years since this keeps happening and the RS dept. keeps failing to comply with the SLA on a regular basis > Kind regards, > > Roman Kalinin > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elvis%40v4escrow.net > -- This message was sent from a mobile device. Some typos may be possible. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20210914/014293c4/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Registry Services Ticket Response Time
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Ticketing System / Roadmaps
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]