[members-discuss] Injection of false RPKI ROAs

So need to form a policy to make RIPE members informed about any requests, and enforce it to be included into RIPE NCC rules of conduct.


Best regards,

Ivan Kazmin

________________________________
От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> от имени Max Tulyev <maxtul at netassist.ua>
Отправлено: 26 октября 2020 г. 13:04:20
Кому: members-discuss at ripe.net
Тема: Re: [members-discuss] Injection of false RPKI ROAs

Dear Maxi,

technically - yes, they can.

For me, that is the main disadvantage of any centralized PKI system.

On 23.10.20 14:37, Maxi wrote:
> Dear fellow Members,
> Dear RIPE Team,
>
> We currently discuss a somehow strange thing.
>
> Could the RIPE NCC be forced to inject false ROAs (e.g. for censorship)?
> If so, is there any legal framework for it?
>
> Does the RIPE NCC have any information on attempts?
>
> Best,
> Maxi
>
> Impressum:
> Zeug e.K.
> Hochstraße 15
> 92637 Theisseil
>
> Inhaber: Maximilian Schieder
>
> Telefon: 015678 572314
> E-Mail: maxi at zeug.co <mailto:maxi at zeug.co>
>
> Registergericht:
> Amtsgericht Weiden in der Oberpfalz Registernummer:
> HRA 2907
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/maxtul%40netassist.ua
>

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss at ripe.net
https://mailman.ripe.net/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/i.kazmin%40corpsoft24.ru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20201027/8d8f9dec/attachment.html>