This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/

[members-discuss] Injection of false RPKI ROAs

Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Injection of false RPKI ROAs
Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Injection of false RPKI ROAs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Max Tulyev maxtul at netassist.ua
Mon Oct 26 11:04:20 CET 2020

Dear Maxi,

technically - yes, they can.

For me, that is the main disadvantage of any centralized PKI system.

On 23.10.20 14:37, Maxi wrote:
> Dear fellow Members,
> Dear RIPE Team,
> 
> We currently discuss a somehow strange thing.
> 
> Could the RIPE NCC be forced to inject false ROAs (e.g. for censorship)? 
> If so, is there any legal framework for it?
> 
> Does the RIPE NCC have any information on attempts?
> 
> Best,
> Maxi
> 
> Impressum:
> Zeug e.K.
> Hochstraße 15
> 92637 Theisseil
> 
> Inhaber: Maximilian Schieder
> 
> Telefon: 015678 572314
> E-Mail: maxi at zeug.co <mailto:maxi at zeug.co>
> 
> Registergericht:
> Amtsgericht Weiden in der Oberpfalz Registernummer:
> HRA 2907
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/maxtul%40netassist.ua
>

Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Injection of false RPKI ROAs
Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Injection of false RPKI ROAs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ members-discuss Archives ]