This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Good to know
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denys Fedoryshchenko
nuclearcat at nuclearcat.com
Fri May 1 13:11:26 CEST 2020
On 2020-05-01 14:02, Elad Cohen wrote: > ---- > "My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, > worked > out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone." > ---- > This list showed to you that anyone related to IPv6 will resist IPv4+ > , an idea can implement changes that will hurt people enjoying from > the current state (such as IPv6 deployers). > > Respectfully, > Elad This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment). And yet, I repeat the question - can I see where these ideas were discussed previously?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Good to know
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]