This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
ccavadore at vedege.net
Wed Jul 8 18:56:30 CEST 2020
Le mercredi 08 juillet 2020 à 19:49 +0300, Max Tulyev a écrit : > I think the root of the problem is RIPE is not enough involved in > RIPE NCC internal processes. We (as RIPE) should have more influence > in RIPE NCC procedures and it's development. Please support me > anyone if I'm right. That's exactly the point I'm trying to raise here, at the community level: I think that RIPE-709 is conter productive for the members, and I'd like to see a bit more flexibility in its processes. I am loosing my time in paperwork, while I need to update stuffs in the DB (and request an ASN on behalf of that customer), and I'm just stuck in administrative matters, just because of that mess. And if I need to open another membership in vacation period, I'll loose more and more time... sigh ! Clément Cavadore
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Administrative procedures within RIPE NCC: Any way to soften it ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]