[members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at linx.net
Fri Jun 7 14:05:22 CEST 2019
On 7 Jun 2019, at 12:54, Rudolf E. Steiner <r.steiner at nemox.net> wrote: >> Split them into different IP addresses and RIPE won’t mind. > > I know. But RIPE is not the internet-police. > > Don't block open resolvers! You can warn, if you want. Most registrars check the same for forward delegations so I think RIPE checking the same for reverse make sense. - Kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]