This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rudolf E. Steiner
r.steiner at nemox.net
Fri Jun 7 13:53:23 CEST 2019
Simon Lockhart quoted/wrote: >> Don't blacklist open resolvers RIPE! > Surely running an open resolver and your authoritative name server on the same IP address is not considered good practice? Not in all situations. > Split them into different IP addresses and RIPE won’t mind. I know. But RIPE is not the internet-police. Don't block open resolvers! You can warn, if you want. -- nemox.net Rudolf E. Steiner r.steiner at nemox.net http://nemox.net/pdat/res/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: r_steiner.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 265 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190607/0843fced/attachment.vcf> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4184 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190607/0843fced/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New (silent) reverse dns checks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]