[members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme

Hi

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 08:35:30PM +0200, ivaylo wrote:
> I dont full agree. As IPV6 space is not infinite number, the space can 
> over in some moment.
> 
> Let me give you same example as yours:
> 
> If you have 5 kids and 100 cakes, it is clear that they cant fully eat the 
> cakes. But if you give all the 100 cakes to the kids, they will bite 
> a little from every cake to taste if there are difference, and in the end 
> you will end up with 0 cakes and lot of uneaten valuable resources.

Just do the math, please.

All these arguments have been brought forward hundreds and thousands of
times in the last 20 years, by people who were just too lazy to run the
numbers.

I am willing to reconsider my position if we hit 50% utilization of FP001
in my lifetime (*and* buy everyone a beer who comes and says "told you 
so!").  In this very unlikely event (MATH!), we have burned through 
half of 1/8 of the overall address space, and have 14 more tries to 
make a more restrictive policy.


(The kids won't try all 100 cakes :-) )

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190121/1a33baf8/attachment.sig>