[members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ivaylo
ivaylo at bglans.net
Mon Jan 21 19:35:30 CET 2019
Hello, I dont full agree. As IPV6 space is not infinite number, the space can over in some moment. Let me give you same example as yours: If you have 5 kids and 100 cakes, it is clear that they cant fully eat the cakes. But if you give all the 100 cakes to the kids, they will bite a little from every cake to taste if there are difference, and in the end you will end up with 0 cakes and lot of uneaten valuable resources. Ivaylo Josifov Varteh LTD Varna Bulgaria On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 05:07:24PM +0000, J?rgen Hovland wrote: >> <html><body><div>I don't think the point of IPv6 is to spend, spend, >> spend either.</div><div>A limited resource will always run out. If you >> think you are going to need a quadruple billion IP-addresses on every LAN, then sure go a head and spend. > > Do the math. A limited resources (IPv6 addresses) distributed over > *another* limited resource (humans running networks) will or will not > run out, depending on the distribution ratio. > > As in: if you have 100 cakes and 5 kids, there is no way these kids are > going to eat all the cakes, no matter how liberal your cake distribution > policies are. > > > We've been distributing IPv6 prefixes for slightly over 20 years now, > and we haven't used up 1% of 1/8 of the IPv6 space yet. The growth > curve isn't exponential, as the number of "ISP like" entities that > will request a prefix from the RIRs is limited - right now, below > 20.000 LIRs in the RIPE NCC service region. To give them all a /29 > would need half a /14. Now, we have LIRs that are happy with a /32, > and we have others that need (or at least "can argue for") a /19 - but > those are few, like 1-2 per country. > > Overall the numbers suggest that all of RIPE land should be fine with > a /10 or /9. Which is 1/512 of the total IPv6 space (or 1/64 of FP001 > which is all that is available today). > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair, and math enthusiast > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]