This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Taras Heichenko
tasic at hostmaster.ua
Thu Apr 25 10:26:23 CEST 2019
> On Apr 24, 2019, at 23:11, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > > Hi, Hi, > >> I guess in order to get some good result of this discussion would be best if board manager add third option into list: "I am not satisfied with option a) and b) and want contnue discuss." > > I guess an abstention could indicate that you don't want to vote for the options given. If a lot of people abstain then that would be a significant message to the board. There are more than 20000 LIRs. Usually voting at GM shows less than 2000 votes. What exactly message does make this percent of voters to the board? > > Cheers, > Sander > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/tasic%40hostmaster.ua -- Best regards Taras Heichenko tasic at hostmaster.ua
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]