This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
REG ID: pl.skonet
lir at skonet.pl
Thu Apr 25 06:12:56 CEST 2019
W dniu 24.04.2019 o 22:11, Sander Steffann pisze: > Hi, > >> I guess in order to get some good result of this discussion would be best if board manager add third option into list: "I am not satisfied with option a) and b) and want contnue discuss." > I guess an abstention could indicate that you don't want to vote for the options given. If a lot of people abstain then that would be a significant message to the board. > > Cheers, > Sander Please remember, that by low voter turnout, often win options that we would not really like. In this particular situation witch charging scheme potential abstentions should vote for the status quo. Otherwise, a "abstain" vote means tipping the scales to one side, not necessarily the real will of the majority. Best regards, Tomasz Śląski pl.ip4isp, pl.skonet, pl.tsla-1
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Board Reasoning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]