[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Burkov
dburk at burkov.aha.ru
Wed Apr 17 23:55:03 CEST 2019
Gert, please, don't try to open Pandora box again... Or we are membership association or service provider with all potential ... regards, Dima On 4/17/19 11:06 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:42:15PM +0300, Andrejs Guba wrote: >> So i repeat. It will be interesting to listen to someone who can describe >> his logic in proposed scheme B. > I didn't propose it, but I like scheme B. > > Why? Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused > PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them > lie around, unused. If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just > to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back. > > (I returned one of my ASNs when they did still cost money, back before > we changed the charging scheme last time - exactly because) > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/dburk%40burkov.aha.ru -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190418/a8e74d01/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]