[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrejs Guba
lir at private.lv
Wed Apr 17 22:13:18 CEST 2019
Hello Gert, To return unused ASN maybe .. but they are strongly asked to return anyway. PI , no - the cost will remain the same according to both schemes. > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:42:15PM +0300, Andrejs Guba wrote: >> So i repeat. It will be interesting to listen to someone who can >> describe >> his logic in proposed scheme B. > > I didn't propose it, but I like scheme B. > > Why? Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused > PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them > lie around, unused. If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just > to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back. > > (I returned one of my ASNs when they did still cost money, back before > we changed the charging scheme last time - exactly because) > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]