[members-discuss] LIR’s billing issues with RIPE NCC, need support

Hello,


thanks Lutz, couldn't have put it any better. Makes 100% sense, in particular for a not-for-profit (!), community-based organization like RIPE.



Cheers,


  Christoph



________________________________
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Lutz Donnerhacke <L.Donnerhacke at iks-service.de>
Sent: 04 December 2018 11:53:52
To: 'members-discuss at ripe.net'
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] LIR’s billing issues with RIPE NCC, need support

> So the question is: What is the reason for this rule if you think we need it to be kept?

Stability.
It's bad for any organisation, if the members come and go too quickly.

We - as a community - want to welcome newcomers, so becoming a LIR should be easy. That's why it's accepted to make a compromise between fiscal year and entry time.

OTOH we - as a community - do not want to encourage people to misuse the address assignment policy for their sole purpose, which involves creating and merging LIRs quickly. That's why another compromise to ease their life is so likely.

Yes, that's a bit bitter for companies which need to shut down or are taken over. But that's normal contractual risk.

IMHO.
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss at ripe.net
https://mailman.ripe.net/
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/viethen%40itc.rwth-aachen.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20181204/2951939f/attachment.html>