This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] RIPE NCC and the geopolitical situation
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC and the geopolitical situation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC and the geopolitical situation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Remigiusz Marcinkiewicz
remigiusz at marcinkiewicz.me
Tue Apr 17 19:21:15 CEST 2018
On wtorek, 17 kwietnia 2018 17:37:23 CEST Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > All, > [words] Let me be the first to say: thank you. For taking the time and effort to try to define problems and ask questions instead of spewing "solutions" to unspecified issues and "answers" to unstated concerns, that accomplish little more than aggravate the already completely disorganized discussion. I'm not even sure right now whether you defined the problem correctly (or defined *the* correct problem in the first place) or asked the right questions, but the fact that you tried has a value in and of itself. Ladies, Gentlemen, PLEASE, keep in mind that: - in order to solve a problem, FIRST we have to define this problem - to solve a defined problem, we have to agree that the problem actually exists - to come up with possible solutions to a real and well-defined problem, we need to establish a metric that evaluates whether the problem is solved or not - to compare the submitted solutions, we need to determine the actual effects of a given solution, including unintended side effects. This needs to be done in the above order, as explicitly as possible. Skipping any of those steps usually leads to a completely pointless exchange of mutually unintelligible statements that only make sense within the context of their author's personal understanding of some problem that they never properly shared with anyone else. In other words: if the other guy is talking nonsense, that's because you think they're talking about something you're thinking about, but they're not, they're talking about something THEY are thinking about and you have no idea what it is. Neither they have any idea what you're thinking about and why YOU are talking nonsense. Stop right there and establish some basic shared facts. Above all else, when discussing technology, finances, effect of changes on members, etc., the single most important thing to base all these things on is COLD, HARD DATA. There, sorry for sort-of-hijacking the thread. And thank you again, Sasha. Please try to keep any comments related to the above, and not to Sasha's message, in a separate thread. Regards, Remigiusz Marcinkiewicz Warsaw Hackerspace // https://bgp.wtf/ // https://hackerspace.pl/ -- Remigiusz Marcinkiewicz, remigiusz at marcinkiewicz.me -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20180417/f21429ec/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC and the geopolitical situation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC and the geopolitical situation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]