This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/

[members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders

Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Radu-Adrian Feurdean ripe-ncc at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Tue Sep 27 14:36:01 CEST 2016

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 13:37, Simon Lockhart wrote:

> They can't - but they can refuse to provide the "free" RIR services to anyone
> other than either the original legacy allocation holder, or the current holder
> of the entire original legacy allocation. If you buy or lease a portion of
> the legacy address space, then as far as the RIRs are concerned, you
> should not be given any special treatment.

Thanks,

That was the point I also wanted to get to. A legacy block stays legacy
as long as it stays in one piece (the one initially given by IANA). Keep
it that way or convert it to PA(/PI???).

-- 
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN

Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ members-discuss Archives ]