This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] About IPv6 tunnels and other incentives
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] About IPv6 tunnels and other incentives
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] About IPv6 tunnels and other incentives
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Fri Sep 23 11:35:23 CEST 2016
On 23/09/16 09:24, Anthony Somerset wrote: > This sounds like the perfect idea though > > Lobby the main providers/generators of Internet Bandwidth usage to only > support IPv6 on new tech/products - even if only for initial launch phases. > > For example Netflix is starting to do UHD/4k, wouldn’t it be great if we > could get them and google and others to only offer 4k/UHD on V6 only for > a period of time like 3-6 months or even longer. With my Chairman's hat firmly to one side, I said a long time ago that the best way to ensure IPv6 adoption was to make it a condition of the issuing of the gtld that all .xxx sites were IPv6 only. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] About IPv6 tunnels and other incentives
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] About IPv6 tunnels and other incentives
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]