This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Armstrong
t.armstrong at nerdalize.com
Thu Sep 22 01:06:54 CEST 2016
Hi, I'm the technical contract for two small LIRs (two completely separate companies). While it might be in my interest in the short term to back a proposal to "reclaim IPv4 addresses", I'd like to my name down twofold for the "stop this time wasting stupidity" team. IPv4 IS DEAD! If you need more then you are misunderstanding what your /22 was allocated to you for (BTW it's a transition utility, it's not intended to be used as primary addressing). Let's move on to constructive discussion on other key topics and stop beating the same dead horse of an augment that seems to rear it's ugly head once a year. It's not going to happen, even if it did it won't change a thing. So get over it and deploy CGN if you are out of addresses. -Tim. On 21 Sep 2016 11:25 p.m., "Simon Lockhart" < s.lockhart at cablecomnetworking.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed Sep 21, 2016 at 08:11:34PM +0100, Academia NOC wrote: > > I feel this is because their bosses would then start asking if the need > it > > all. They'd then be pressured financially to return their 'cushions'. > > And what, exactly, would this achieve? > > RIPE have sufficient reserves to meet the needs of the current IPv4 > allocation > policies for the foreseeable future. > > Do you think that if these 'cushions' were returned, RIPE would suddenly > change their allocation policies, and IPv4 would become freely available > again? > If hell were to freeze over, and this were to happen, then it'd last the > grand > sum of 6 months, if we're really lucky. More likely, 6 weeks, or even 6 > days. > And then we're back to where we started from, and we've wasted a load of > effort > on trying to fix a problem that can't be fixed. > > STOP TRYING TO COME UP WITH WAYS TO RECLAIM IPv4 ADDRESSES. IT WILL ACHIEVE > NOTHING. > > Simon > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the > general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From > here, you can add or remove addresses. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160922/99c3b0ee/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]