This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Simon Lockhart
s.lockhart at cablecomnetworking.co.uk
Wed Sep 21 23:24:58 CEST 2016
On Wed Sep 21, 2016 at 08:11:34PM +0100, Academia NOC wrote: > I feel this is because their bosses would then start asking if the need it > all. They'd then be pressured financially to return their 'cushions'. And what, exactly, would this achieve? RIPE have sufficient reserves to meet the needs of the current IPv4 allocation policies for the foreseeable future. Do you think that if these 'cushions' were returned, RIPE would suddenly change their allocation policies, and IPv4 would become freely available again? If hell were to freeze over, and this were to happen, then it'd last the grand sum of 6 months, if we're really lucky. More likely, 6 weeks, or even 6 days. And then we're back to where we started from, and we've wasted a load of effort on trying to fix a problem that can't be fixed. STOP TRYING TO COME UP WITH WAYS TO RECLAIM IPv4 ADDRESSES. IT WILL ACHIEVE NOTHING. Simon
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]