This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Silvan Gebhardt
gebhardt at openfactory.ch
Wed Sep 14 13:04:30 CEST 2016
I am totally aware of that. I replied to the technical possiblity after someone said that this would be impossible since IXes are L2 only ;) let's drop this thread sideline! and can we get rid of the <explicit words> ticket systems? I have in the meantime received 3 autoreplies directly to me, and 1 undeliverables I have received username and passwords for 2 ticket systems, and about 2 tickets are open for me WTF why do people subscribe their ticket systems if they have autoreplies on that address. At least with OTRS, I can set things to be on "swallow it but don't say anything" Silvan On 09/14/2016 12:57 PM, Arjan van der Oest wrote: > I can't speak for other IX'es but at least AMS-IX charges for port-speed, not for volume of traffic neither type of traffic. And brutally honest: this is never going to change simply because it's not the role of an exchange. >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]