This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arjan van der Oest
Arjan.vanderOest at voiceworks.com
Wed Sep 14 12:57:15 CEST 2016
> On 14 Sep 2016, at 12:27, Silvan M. Gebhardt <gebhardt at openfactory.ch> wrote: > > yes but the IX assigns the Peering IP's in their subnet Allocation ;) > > so it would be "Price v4 and v6 peering ip's differently" I can't speak for other IX'es but at least AMS-IX charges for port-speed, not for volume of traffic neither type of traffic. And brutally honest: this is never going to change simply because it's not the role of an exchange. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Arjan van der Oest Lead Mobile Engineer Voiceworks BV - Oplagestraat 1 - 1321 NK Almere Mobile : +31 6 8686 0000 Office : +31 36 7606656 GPG key on http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Key fingerprint = C58F 55CA C62A 5A49 15E0 2271 3481 6020 997E EE99
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]