This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] IETF funding
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dominik Nowacki
dominik at clouvider.co.uk
Fri May 27 10:23:58 CEST 2016
We pay the money so I suppose the ball is on our (membership) side. Kind Regards, Dom uk.clouvider -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss [mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Radu-Adrian Feurdean Sent: 27 May 2016 09:20 To: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>; Peter Koch <koch at DENIC.DE> Cc: members-discuss at ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] IETF funding On Thu, May 26, 2016, at 09:24, Gert Doering wrote: > Supporting the IETF is good, with a yearly contribution to ISOC or > IETF directly. > > Transferring our reserves to their reserves, I fail to see the > compelling reason why this would be in our (RIPE) interest. Is this something that we (RIPE NCC membership) can decide on, or is it a decision more on IETF-side ? If it is up to us, I would go to "regular" contribution, leaving up to IETF to decide how to deal with it. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]