This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] IETF funding
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian Feurdean
ripe-ncc at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Fri May 27 10:19:36 CEST 2016
On Thu, May 26, 2016, at 09:24, Gert Doering wrote: > Supporting the IETF is good, with a yearly contribution to ISOC or IETF > directly. > > Transferring our reserves to their reserves, I fail to see the compelling > reason why this would be in our (RIPE) interest. Is this something that we (RIPE NCC membership) can decide on, or is it a decision more on IETF-side ? If it is up to us, I would go to "regular" contribution, leaving up to IETF to decide how to deal with it. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IETF funding
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]