This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Olorin Henderson
olorin.henderson at cloudunboxed.net
Wed Feb 17 14:42:29 CET 2016
Hi guys, I agree with Thomas here. Let's say these proposed changes went ahead meaning each entity could have only one LIR account each. There is nothing to stop such people from registering multiple trading entities and opening an LIR account under each trading entity. Here in the UK it costs just £13 to register a new limited company which could be used to independently open up a LIR account. Whichever way you look at it, we have a real world shortage of IPv4 and the system to control its assignment is broken. By the time we 'fix' the system it will already be too late? Kindest regards, -- Olorin Henderson, Operations Director, [Cloud Unboxed Limited] w: cloudunboxed.net [http://www.cloudunboxed.net/] | e: olorin.henderson at cloudunboxed.net [mailto:olorin.henderson at cloudunboxed.net] | t: +44 (0)33 0088 2444 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended for the addressed individual or entity only. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then discard this e-mail. Unauthorized copying, sharing and distributing of this e-mail is prohibited. The content in this e-mail does not necessarily represent the views of the company. The addressee should check all attachments for malware; the company makes no representation as regards the absence of malware in attachments to this e-mail. On 17/02/2016 13:38:40, David Ponzone <david.ponzone at ipeva.fr> wrote: That’s really bad. Would it be so complicated to ask for some information to new applicants (under NDA if necessary), like projected network map, purchase orders, business plan, (relevant) domain name registration, and so on ? And of course, to deny applicants with a generic gmail/yahoo/acme email address. That would make the LIR request process a little bit heavier but at the moment, the whole process is really fast, so I don’t think it would hurt much. David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone at ipeva.fr [mailto:david.ponzone at ipeva.fr] tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr [blocked::http://www.ipeva.fr/] - www.ipeva-studio.com [blocked::http://www.ipeva-studio.com/] Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur. Le 17 févr. 2016 à 14:27, Markus <universe at truemetal.org [mailto:universe at truemetal.org]> a écrit : Am 16.02.2016 um 13:17 schrieb David Treanor: 1. Is the activity of members opening additional LIR accounts a problem that must be prevented? The rapid increase in new account creation seems to indicate that this is being used to abuse the rules. Yes it must be prevented. +1 I would like to bring to everyones attention that it's obviously already possible to create multiple LIRs under the same company: # wget http://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/stats/membership/alloclist.txt [http://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/stats/membership/alloclist.txt] # cat alloclist.txt | grep ^[a-z][a-z]. | cut -b 1-6 | uniq -c | sort -rn 36 uk.ngs ... 10 ae.hax Meaning: If you look at http://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/stats/membership/alloclist.txt [http://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/stats/membership/alloclist.txt] in your browser you'll find that "HAX CONSULTANCY DMCC" (HAX as in hack(s)...) has opened 10 LIRs, and "Next Global Services LP" has opened a whopping 36 LIRs. Each has a /22 of course. HAX uses a gmail address as their LIR address. :-) https://www.ripe.net/membership/indices/data/ae.hax201.html [https://www.ripe.net/membership/indices/data/ae.hax201.html] NGS is in control of 36.864 IPs. If they sell every IP at a bargain price of 6 EUR per IP they've earned 221.184 EUR. This guys costs were 72.000 EUR one-time (36 x 2.000 EUR setup fee) and 57.600 EUR for the first year (36 x 1.600 EUR) = 129.600 EUR. 221.184 EUR - 129.600 EUR = 91.584 EUR profit made out of thin air. Not bad! Really, RIPE? Cheers Markus ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160217/aea9bb19/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]