[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts

W dniu 2016-02-11 o 16:52, Jack pisze:
> Well there are compagnies in that wild world that :
> - are "new" (didn't exists in near 2k)
> - have a huge utilization of IP addresses
> - do not have enough money to pay 15€/IPv4
>
> Are they just supposed to die ?
> You cannot blame the survive instinct:)
>
> Buying a compagny to get its IP are a solution for rich people, I am
> pretty sure that google, lvl3 nor akamai will ever run out of IP

I agree with Jack.

Market price per IP is to expensive. We have lot of  small companies in 
Poland which are serving services in "white area's - called white stains 
- where there is no business for big ISP to invest ", this is more 
voluntary services than business.
All they have the same problem - lack of IPv4.

But I think problem is similar in other countries.

Setup additional LIR account is not logical. Why to pay /22 if you don't 
need this at this moment.

I think it should be "Additional Fee for resources additional resources 
more than /22 "
It should be based on minimal  /24 allocation and with annual fee that 
will not exceed annual provider fee for /22.
This fee should be based on quarter of year. With some reasonable 
request limit by year.

For example annual fee for /24 is 340E
If you request it in May you will pay 225E.
If you lost a client you will return /24 back to ripe.

It will help smaller ISP/LIRs  to serve our services.

We have almost 4500 km of network with /22.
I know companies who do not have any network now but they have /18 /20.

It should be a rule to get legal address space, not buying it from the 
market.


Best regards
Dariusz Siedlecki
Glenbrook


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160212/b450e612/attachment.html>