This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
ripe-md at c4inet.net
Sat Mar 28 15:44:56 CET 2015
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 01:55:45PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >I am fairly sure I said it back then as well: the way new charging >schemes are usually presented ("take this or leave it") does not actually >help - if people overall agree with the changes, like "it will get cheaper >for me!", but still disagree with the policy implications, what are they >supposed to vote for? I'm not sure it would be possible to vote on CC items separately - I guess it would have to be different options (eg if ASN charge of nEUR then membership fee is xEUR, etc) to make the CC match the Budget in all cases. I wouldn't bet on the outcome either - I can think of a few LIRs who'd want the PI charge to be zero too, let alone ASN charges... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]