This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Mon Jan 26 14:14:37 CET 2015
On 26/01/2015 12:29, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > If all this is about is "garbage collection", a possible solution > would be to "audit" independent resources yearly Sasha, this isn't just about GC; it's about a lot of things, including: - allowing the ASN assignment process to become far simpler and more transparent than it currently is - creating a mechanism to help prevent hoarding of resources - aligning RIPE NCC policy with existing RIPE community policy - ensuring that end users of PI resources cover the costs of running their share of the registry - ensuring that there is a mechanism to encourage end users to return unused ASNs to the RIPE NCC. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]