[members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
ripe-md at c4inet.net
Mon Jan 26 13:29:34 CET 2015
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 01:01:46PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >So, LIRs with few ASes sponsor LIRs with many ASes. In the same way that LIRs with one /22 sponsor those with multiple /12. Charging piddly sums for ASN will not fundamentally change this "unfairness". If all this is about is "garbage collection", a possible solution would be to "audit" independent resources yearly - as simple as asking "are these resources still in use and by whom" and reclaim negatives/unreachables. If it is about someone getting something for free, the whole one-LIR-one fee debate needs to be reopened. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2016 Discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]