This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles ofAssociation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 09:00:04 CEST 2014
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Nigel Titley <nigel at titley.com> wrote: > On 25/06/14 13:23, Sander Steffann wrote: >> Hi Nigel, >> >> Op 25 jun. 2014, om 13:02 heeft Nigel Titley <nigel at titley.com> het volgende geschreven: >> Indeed. Discussing the results of the voting, congratulating new board members, thanking old board members etc has to be part of the meeting in my opinion. A voting window of 24 hours seems the most fair to everybody because 24 hours will include one normal full working day for everybody. >> >> > In practice this will mean making the announcement at some time on > Friday morning, which I don't think is too much of an issue, especially > as we now make the announcement generally rather than just to members. > We could either make it first thing (before the plenary starts) or > during the morning break. The latter would seem to be most sensible > (assuming the PC is happy with this). > > All the best Sounds like a good solution. To sum it all up as I see it: - 24hours voting window as a max. See no real need for 2-3days, if you need that much time you should delegate the voting. - Open voting as today. It would be unwise to open voting before discussions in General Meeting (GM) are done so I'm strongly against that. Might be arriving new information that change the entire game? - Announce result sometime during the RIPE meeting, if that mean we have to move GM to an earlier day, so be it. - Proxy voting can, probably will, and probably already have been "missused" to get your (for any definition of you) candidate voted in. However there are real use cases for proxy voting so we need to support it somehow. I like the suggestion that LIRs have an option to delegate their voting rights to someone else online. - Paper voting is extra work if you compare it to full electronic voting, however we have this privacy vs anonymity issue. It is not an easy answer to that. What I suggest - all that register for GM and voting on RIPE70 should by default get the online vote options selected. If they want to vote using paper they have to select it themself. - Accountability should be improved, but first I think we need to better understand the real problem. Is it lack of trust, or just need to double check the result? -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles ofAssociation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]