This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Jun 25 18:46:04 CEST 2014
Hi Rob, Op 25 jun. 2014, om 18:30 heeft rob.golding at astutium.com het volgende geschreven: > Then IMHO voting _really_ needs to open a day earlier - whilst I > understand the board want people to listen and maybe change their mind, > but my experience is that the minds are made up *weeks* if not months in > advance. I strongly disagree. This may be true for things that are published months in advance and not further discussed during the AGM. At the last AGM there was a lot of discussion on some subjects, and for me the presentations of the candidates for the board also made a big difference. If people vote blindly then what point is there in having an AGM with discussions in the first place? Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Request to amend the RIPE NCC Articles of Association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]