This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Oct 23 11:14:02 CEST 2013
On 23/10/2013 10:04, Daniel Stolpe wrote: > While I have some healthy skepticism against some RIPE NCC projects, > and some of the ways they came to be, I think it's also fair to point > out that the activities of the RIPE NCC is presented in the RIPE NCC > activity plan, and that they as of the last one actually does a better > job of breaking up costs in it. > > Absolutely. Thanks to some Russian shouting, if I remember things > correctly. ;-) > Well, the result of the Russian shouting was that the previous year's activity plan was re-published with a better breakdown. The Board had in fact already decided (as a response to, amongst other things, Kurtis' questions at the previous General meeting) that the next Activity plan would have a better breakdown and costing structure. But we would say that wouldn't we ;-) Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]