This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Stolpe
stolpe at resilans.se
Wed Oct 23 11:04:21 CEST 2013
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > > On 23 okt 2013, at 10:26, Daniel Stolpe <stolpe at resilans.se> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote: >> >>> ???? 22/10/2013 8:39 ??, ?/? J?nis Jaunoš?ns ??????: >>>> I like atlas and labs :( >>> >>> Atlas and labs are things that I expect from RIPE NCC because of our >>> membership. >> >> How long have you been a member? Maybe new members are used to this playground business from the start and the older members are more sceptic. >> >> This is more of a principal question than a financial one. With all new members there is probably room in the budget for a lot of not really important things at the same time as the membership fees go down. >> >> But in principle, the Réseaux IP Européens should be about European IP resources. > > > > While I have some healthy skepticism against some RIPE NCC projects, and > some of the ways they came to be, I think it's also fair to point out > that the activities of the RIPE NCC is presented in the RIPE NCC > activity plan, and that they as of the last one actually does a better > job of breaking up costs in it. Absolutely. Thanks to some Russian shouting, if I remember things correctly. ;-) > If you, me or anyone else have concerns or opinions on it, the right > thing is to post comments on it when it is presented to members every > year. Unfortunately the posting if normally comes with a very quiet > mailing list. What we should all be doing during the year though is to > compare activities to it and provide feedback on how well (or not) we > think it's executed. I agree. But I rarely see any debate about this, so if someone has an opinion, it is not obvious when or where to speak up. > That is partly why the NCC Services WG was created once upon a time, and > we have (but rarely) had feedback in there on the performance of the > activities of the NCC. This mailinglist is of course also a good > channel, but I think we need to accept that the NCC does what is in the > activity plan approved by it's members.... Yes. If the majority is happy, then we are done. Cheers, Daniel _________________________________________________________________________________ Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81 stolpe at resilans.se Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/ Box 13 054 556741-1193 103 02 Stockholm
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Marketing? Really?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]