[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>

> Don't try to speak for "most here".  I, for one, have met Lu Heng in
> person,
> have seen him actively take part in the address policy discussions, and
> do trust the RIPE NCC to very closely check whether such a big allocation
> can be backed by numbers and documentation.  So I most certainly do not
> see "CLEARLY" that there would be a violation of RIPE policies - and
> even if it's currently announced from elsewhere, that doesn't mean it's
> not actually *used* in the RIPE service region (think "VPN services"),
> which is the key issue - address space being *used*, and not siphoned
> off elsewhere.  Even though the latter point is a bit moot nowadays.
>
>
Agreed.  However:

nmap -n -sn -PE -T4 37.222.0.0/15
Nmap done: 131072 IP addresses (406 hosts up) scanned in 210.43 seconds

--Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20131121/b3fd644a/attachment.html>