[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:12:33PM +0100, William Weber wrote:
> Also, most here agree with me and you CLEARLY violate RIPE policies with the ARIN routing and others - So *you* are the one that should explain himself, not me.

Speak for yourself, and for "the administration", if you will.

Don't try to speak for "most here".  I, for one, have met Lu Heng in person,
have seen him actively take part in the address policy discussions, and
do trust the RIPE NCC to very closely check whether such a big allocation
can be backed by numbers and documentation.  So I most certainly do not
see "CLEARLY" that there would be a violation of RIPE policies - and 
even if it's currently announced from elsewhere, that doesn't mean it's
not actually *used* in the RIPE service region (think "VPN services"), 
which is the key issue - address space being *used*, and not siphoned 
off elsewhere.  Even though the latter point is a bit moot nowadays.

Gert Doering
        -- The Netmaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20131121/916ef0fa/attachment.sig>