This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Dec 16 12:54:33 CET 2013
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:10:09AM +0000, Sajjad Najafi Zadeh [ MTNIrancell ] wrote:
> Why ripe is not doing re-evaluation for large IP spaces and take back from LIRs if they are not using them to stop this IP market ?
As explained, the address policy framework has no provisions for "taking
back" allocations. So: the RIPE NCC *cannot* do that.
Even if the policy framework would be changed today, it would be doubtful
whether that can be applied retroactively.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20131216/b7aaf5d2/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]