This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrea Cocito
andrea.cocito at ifom.eu
Mon Dec 16 12:22:25 CET 2013
On Dec 16, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Sajjad Najafi Zadeh [ MTNIrancell ] <sajjad.n at mtnirancell.ir> wrote: > HI all, > > Why ripe is not doing re-evaluation for large IP spaces and take back from LIRs if they are not using them to stop this IP market ? > Because re-evaluation would be a long, complex and costly process. On the other side having the membership fee depending in a substantial way on the amount of allocated address space would force LIRs to optimise their usage spontaneously. A.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]