[members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrea Cocito
andrea.cocito at ifom.eu
Mon Dec 16 12:22:25 CET 2013
On Dec 16, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Sajjad Najafi Zadeh [ MTNIrancell ] <sajjad.n at mtnirancell.ir> wrote: > HI all, > > Why ripe is not doing re-evaluation for large IP spaces and take back from LIRs if they are not using them to stop this IP market ? > Because re-evaluation would be a long, complex and costly process. On the other side having the membership fee depending in a substantial way on the amount of allocated address space would force LIRs to optimise their usage spontaneously. A.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]