[members-discuss] [Ticket#2012072401002498] Probably Free /8 networks in RIPE region
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012072401002498] Probably Free /8 networks in RIPE region
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] desperate for ipv4 much?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Fri Jul 27 13:20:10 CEST 2012
It is a good idea to read that law closely. May be they forget to point what *exactly* static IP should be provided to each contract. If yes - then assigning a static *IPv6* address and NATed private IPv4 is legal enough ;) 27.07.12 13:33, Paolo Di Francesco написав(ла): >> We had a static IP - I also had a phoneline and Internet from WIND (Or >> Telecom Italia) under another contract which had *no* IP and was NATed >> (Hell, even multilevel NAT....) > > As I said, it's a national law against terrorism. Yes you can do some > form of NAT (afaik Fastweb does it) but you must do a "one customer NAT" > with is quite long to explain. > > But the law says "one contract = one public IP". > > Long story anyway I can explain in private if you are curious ;)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012072401002498] Probably Free /8 networks in RIPE region
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] desperate for ipv4 much?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]