This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tero Toikkanen
Tero.Toikkanen at nebula.fi
Wed Jul 25 15:15:22 CEST 2012
This is routinely circumvented using the Network Infrastructure and End User Networks clause of IPv4 allocation policy: "IP addresses used solely for the connection of an End User to a service provider (e.g. point-to-point links) are considered part of the service provider's infrastructure. These addresses do not have to be registered with the End User's contact details but can be registered as part of the service provider's internal infrastructure." That clause has been interpreted so that allowing the End User to use a small number of addresses (max 4, if remember correctly) from the PI allocation, it's OK. Such clause does not exist in IPv6-world, which makes IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI different in this respect. ____________________________________ Tero Toikkanen Nebula Oy > -----Original Message----- > From: members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss- > bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Mike Simkins > Sent: 25. heinäkuuta 2012 15:54 > To: Max Tulyev; members-discuss at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion > > I do not believe you can use IPv4 PI for that, it is for the PI Holders OWN use > only, not to be allocated to customers and so on > > -----Original Message----- > From: members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net > [mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Max Tulyev > Sent: 25 July 2012 13:42 > To: members-discuss at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion > > 25.07.12 15:35, Sebastian Wiesinger написав(ла): > > exactly what do you need to qualify for IPv6 PI? The last time I > > looked[1] there was no requirements except the contractual ones to get > > a /48. > > Hostmasters rejects requests where some of IPv6 address space is for > interconnecting third parties (i.e. interface IPs, colo, LAN with customers, > etc), while for IPv4 PI it is possible and used widely. > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general > page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, > you can add or remove addresses. > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general > page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, > you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]