This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Wed Jul 25 13:53:16 CEST 2012
25.07.12 14:49, Tomas Hlavacek написав(ла): > Why and how will use this huge extra income form that fee, if this > happens? > > > Well I do not know... I wanted to say that you can set fee high enough > to really achieve some effects on address distribution but it brings a > risk of deep and irreversible changes in the whole industry. Or you can > set the fees low, which is not going to cause anything good or bad. This is the main question. We should consider it well before RIPE NCC move from non-profit to profit company.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]