[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tomas Hlavacek
tomas.hlavacek at ignum.cz
Wed Jul 25 13:49:56 CEST 2012
Hello! On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Max Tulyev <president at ukraine.su> wrote: > > With pay-per-IP model we have two options: 1) We can set fee really high > > to stimulate people to return their unused resources or even higher to > > force people to deploy CGNs and redesign networks in order to return > > resources that are currently in use. > > Why and how will use this huge extra income form that fee, if this happens? Well I do not know... I wanted to say that you can set fee high enough to really achieve some effects on address distribution but it brings a risk of deep and irreversible changes in the whole industry. Or you can set the fees low, which is not going to cause anything good or bad. Tomas -- Tomáš Hlaváček ------------------------------------------------- IGNUM s.r.o. | Vinohradská 190 | Praha 3 | 130 61 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120725/d270e9f6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]