This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LIR
lir at lanto.it
Sat Jul 14 14:26:49 CEST 2012
Il 14/07/2012 02:03, Rob Evans ha scritto: > Hi, > >> If the incoming money serves to cover expenses, there should not be any >> profit on which to pay taxes, ot it should be very low. > Are you sure the tax is only on profits? And you sure it is not? Here in Italy, I pay tax on profit, so I suppose it should happen also there. > > The RIPE NCC allocates Internet number resources to its members as needed ("need" being based on community-derived policy). We pay membership fees to allow this to happen. One of those resources is running low, but isn't it a short-term view to base membership fees on that one resource? No, because in this moment that is the valued resource, and who is using value resource should pay for it. The big rubbery is this big companies are paying peanuts since dozen of years, for these valued resourse, thank to the crazy calculation used until now. Just thinking if this case should be filed at an anti-trust commission at european level. Regards, Tonino > Cheers, > Rob > >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]