This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Sat Jul 14 02:03:22 CEST 2012
Hi,
> If the incoming money serves to cover expenses, there should not be any
> profit on which to pay taxes, ot it should be very low.
Are you sure the tax is only on profits?
The RIPE NCC allocates Internet number resources to its members as needed ("need" being based on community-derived policy). We pay membership fees to allow this to happen. One of those resources is running low, but isn't it a short-term view to base membership fees on that one resource?
Cheers,
Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]