[members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jul 11 20:30:39 CEST 2012
Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:40:08PM +0000, Mark Jones (MK) wrote: > I suspect a lot of activities/resources will die off when the NCC stock of IPV4 addresses gets exhausted. RIPE won't be involved or will be needed to approve transfer/sales of IPV4 between LIR's. Most LIR's will have /32 of IPV6 so they won't need to talk to the LIR again unless in the unlikely event they issue a /48 or more to a customer... "More than a /48", to be specific. A single /48 per end-site is ok without asking the RIPE NCC for approval. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]