This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Problem transit traffic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Problem transit traffic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Problem transit traffic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gairat Ismoilzoda
munis at tajnet.tj
Wed Feb 15 14:44:55 CET 2012
Dear , I think he want to say, the Kazakhtelecomm(AS9198) block gmail.com, blogspot.com, livejournal.com etc. Can the RIPE to solve this problem? > > On 15/02/2012, at 10.08, Azamat Soyuzbekov wrote: > >> >> Our two path. (Our AS50223) Example: >> *> 2.16.56.0/23 212.42.96. 0 260 0 8449 3216 2914 4436 20940 20940 i >> * 213.145.131. 0 255 0 12997 9198 20485 3549 20940 20940 i >> by 8449 it works, but through the 12997 does not work. >> 12997 says that 9198 blocks. On many forums, users are complaining that the 9198 block sites. >> On the request is silent and does not meet. > > Please try explaining with more words, having to do an interrogation by email is so annoying and > slow. > Even if your english skills are less than perfect, try :-) (I guess most of the RIPE participants > don't have english as a native language anyway) > > So, from above I guess: > > you are AS50223 Alfa Telecom CJSC located in Kyrgyzstan peering with AS8449 Join Venture Company > "ElCat" and AS12997 JSC Kyrgyztelecom > > According to bgp.he.net you announce these prefixes: > 46.251.192.0/19 Alfa Telecom CJSC > 46.251.200.0/22 Alfa Telecom CJSC > 109.71.224.0/21 Alfa Telecom CJSC > 109.71.224.0/22 Alfa Telecom CJSC > 109.71.228.0/22 Alfa Telecom CJSC > > According to RIPE RIS you have these: > Prefix Size Last seen First seen Whois Registry Peers seeing > 46.251.200.0/22 22 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-19 07:58:53 UTC W RIPE NCC 95 > 109.71.228.0/23 23 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-04-30 16:55:04 UTC W RIPE NCC 2 > 109.71.228.0/22 22 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2012-01-19 08:43:07 UTC W RIPE NCC 101 > 109.71.224.0/22 22 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-14 21:34:10 UTC W RIPE NCC 95 > 109.71.224.0/21 21 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-14 21:34:08 UTC W RIPE NCC 103 > 109.71.230.0/23 23 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-14 21:31:32 UTC W RIPE NCC 2 > 46.251.192.0/19 19 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-14 21:34:08 UTC W RIPE NCC 103 > > > The route you mention > route: 2.16.56.0/23 > descr: Akamai Technologies > origin: AS20940 > and is part of 2.16.0.0/13 > > BTW I see these on some of my routers as: > 2.16.56.0/23 *[BGP/170] 2d 09:41:05, MED 3593, localpref 110 > AS path: 3549 20940 20940 I > > to 64.211.195.225 via xe-5/0/0.0 > [BGP/170] 4w0d 23:14:11, localpref 100 > AS path: 16245 3292 20940 I > > to 83.221.128.125 via xe-2/0/0.0 > > 2.16.56.0/23 *[BGP/170] 2d 09:41:14, MED 3593, localpref 110 > AS path: 3549 20940 20940 I > > to 109.238.48.254 via ae0.94 > [BGP/170] 1w6d 08:06:05, MED 0, localpref 110 > AS path: 3356 3549 20940 20940 I > > to 213.242.108.9 via xe-2/0/0.0 > So it would seem you have received these Akamai prefixes correctly, a good start > > Then hopefully we can get down to your problem. > > "I have to you have a question? If an ISP blocks the transit traffic is what rules they break, and > if we can resolve this issue through Ripe?" > > and > " > Our two path. (Our AS50223) Example: > *> 2.16.56.0/23 212.42.96. 0 260 0 8449 3216 2914 4436 20940 20940 i > * 213.145.131. 0 255 0 12997 9198 20485 3549 20940 20940 i > by 8449 it works, but through the 12997 does not work. > 12997 says that 9198 blocks. On many forums, users are complaining that the 9198 block sites. > On the request is silent and does not meet. > " > > Do you have a problem reaching Akamai - do you have problems reaching other destinations? > Do other have problems reaching you? > > Do you have problems with all your own prefixes/addresses? > > Can you use some traffic - like doing ping? but not UDP? or TCP? > > Include more information such as destination addresses tried, and traceroutes to known > destinations that should work. > - I would do the test from each of your own prefixes > > More information is need to help you :-) > > > > BTW I found most of this on: > http://bgp.he.net/AS50223 > http://bgp.he.net/AS9198 > > > Let us know if there is something wrong in the things we guess, so we can get to the matter of the > problem :-) > > > Best regards > > Henrik > > -- > Henrik Lund Kramshøj, Follower of the Great Way of Unix > hlk at kramse.org hlk at solidonetworks.com > +45 2026 6000 cand.scient CISSP CEH > http://solidonetworks.com/ Network Security is a business enabler > > > > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove > addresses. > -- Best regards, Ismoilov Gairatjon ATK Telecomm Technology Internet Service Provider 734002,Tajikistan,Dushanbe str. Bokhtar 35/1 tel.: (992 48) 7010045,7010043 Mob.: (992 93)5002202
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Problem transit traffic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Problem transit traffic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]