This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Problem transit traffic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] FW: Problem transit traffic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Problem transit traffic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Henrik Kramshøj Solido NOC abuse
noc at solido.net
Wed Feb 15 10:26:14 CET 2012
On 15/02/2012, at 10.08, Azamat Soyuzbekov wrote: > > Our two path. (Our AS50223) Example: > *> 2.16.56.0/23 212.42.96. 0 260 0 8449 3216 2914 4436 20940 20940 i > * 213.145.131. 0 255 0 12997 9198 20485 3549 20940 20940 i > by 8449 it works, but through the 12997 does not work. > 12997 says that 9198 blocks. On many forums, users are complaining that the 9198 block sites. > On the request is silent and does not meet. Please try explaining with more words, having to do an interrogation by email is so annoying and slow. Even if your english skills are less than perfect, try :-) (I guess most of the RIPE participants don't have english as a native language anyway) So, from above I guess: you are AS50223 Alfa Telecom CJSC located in Kyrgyzstan peering with AS8449 Join Venture Company "ElCat" and AS12997 JSC Kyrgyztelecom According to bgp.he.net you announce these prefixes: 46.251.192.0/19 Alfa Telecom CJSC 46.251.200.0/22 Alfa Telecom CJSC 109.71.224.0/21 Alfa Telecom CJSC 109.71.224.0/22 Alfa Telecom CJSC 109.71.228.0/22 Alfa Telecom CJSC According to RIPE RIS you have these: Prefix Size Last seen First seen Whois Registry Peers seeing 46.251.200.0/22 22 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-19 07:58:53 UTC W RIPE NCC 95 109.71.228.0/23 23 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-04-30 16:55:04 UTC W RIPE NCC 2 109.71.228.0/22 22 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2012-01-19 08:43:07 UTC W RIPE NCC 101 109.71.224.0/22 22 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-14 21:34:10 UTC W RIPE NCC 95 109.71.224.0/21 21 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-14 21:34:08 UTC W RIPE NCC 103 109.71.230.0/23 23 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-14 21:31:32 UTC W RIPE NCC 2 46.251.192.0/19 19 2012-02-15 08:00:00 UTC 2011-10-14 21:34:08 UTC W RIPE NCC 103 The route you mention route: 2.16.56.0/23 descr: Akamai Technologies origin: AS20940 and is part of 2.16.0.0/13 BTW I see these on some of my routers as: 2.16.56.0/23 *[BGP/170] 2d 09:41:05, MED 3593, localpref 110 AS path: 3549 20940 20940 I > to 64.211.195.225 via xe-5/0/0.0 [BGP/170] 4w0d 23:14:11, localpref 100 AS path: 16245 3292 20940 I > to 83.221.128.125 via xe-2/0/0.0 2.16.56.0/23 *[BGP/170] 2d 09:41:14, MED 3593, localpref 110 AS path: 3549 20940 20940 I > to 109.238.48.254 via ae0.94 [BGP/170] 1w6d 08:06:05, MED 0, localpref 110 AS path: 3356 3549 20940 20940 I > to 213.242.108.9 via xe-2/0/0.0 So it would seem you have received these Akamai prefixes correctly, a good start Then hopefully we can get down to your problem. "I have to you have a question? If an ISP blocks the transit traffic is what rules they break, and if we can resolve this issue through Ripe?" and " Our two path. (Our AS50223) Example: *> 2.16.56.0/23 212.42.96. 0 260 0 8449 3216 2914 4436 20940 20940 i * 213.145.131. 0 255 0 12997 9198 20485 3549 20940 20940 i by 8449 it works, but through the 12997 does not work. 12997 says that 9198 blocks. On many forums, users are complaining that the 9198 block sites. On the request is silent and does not meet. " Do you have a problem reaching Akamai - do you have problems reaching other destinations? Do other have problems reaching you? Do you have problems with all your own prefixes/addresses? Can you use some traffic - like doing ping? but not UDP? or TCP? Include more information such as destination addresses tried, and traceroutes to known destinations that should work. - I would do the test from each of your own prefixes More information is need to help you :-) BTW I found most of this on: http://bgp.he.net/AS50223 http://bgp.he.net/AS9198 Let us know if there is something wrong in the things we guess, so we can get to the matter of the problem :-) Best regards Henrik -- Henrik Lund Kramshøj, Follower of the Great Way of Unix hlk at kramse.org hlk at solidonetworks.com +45 2026 6000 cand.scient CISSP CEH http://solidonetworks.com/ Network Security is a business enabler
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] FW: Problem transit traffic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Problem transit traffic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]