This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [Ticket#2012072401002498] Top 20 LIRs use 33% Allocated PA, 88% of LIRs use 10% Allocated PA.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012072401002498] Top 20 LIRs use 33% Allocated PA, 88% of LIRs use 10% Allocated PA.
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Fri Aug 24 17:51:24 CEST 2012
On 24/08/2012 16:41, Daniel Stolpe wrote: > > > My view of this is that we have been vaguely aware of this business > but we have had no idea of who started it, the budget, the goals etc. > When were the members asked? > > I think measurement could be a good idea but absolutely not the way it > has been going on during the last few years. > > There has to be a clear connection to a working group, goals decided > by the members, an obvious budget for each project etc. And I don't > think it has to be the RIPE NCC perform all the measurements every > time. There might be other solutions. Indeed. And the best place to discuss this would be the MAT working group. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2012072401002498] Top 20 LIRs use 33% Allocated PA, 88% of LIRs use 10% Allocated PA.
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]