This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jochem de Ruig
jochem at ripe.net
Thu Oct 13 16:26:23 CEST 2011
Hi Sascha, > >> Just to confirm Nigel is correct we take a snapshot. >> We use the information we have in the registry on 30 September 2011. > > thank you for the information. > > I would still like an answer to the following questions: > > a) are Independent Resources not assigned to the LIR itself included > in the category calculation and, if yes, > b) what is the justification for this change? > Yes if they are still registered with us under your LIR as the sponsoring LIR. This is not a change, this has been the case since we started charging an additional fee for Independent Resources. There is no per PI assignment fee if the sponsoring LIR lists the resource as not my end User anymore before the snapshot date. Regards, Jochem -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1735 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20111013/21c1305b/attachment.p7s> -------------- next part -------------- ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]