This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Oct 13 15:28:46 CEST 2011
Hi Jochem, On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:52:47AM +0200, Jochem de Ruig wrote: >Just to confirm Nigel is correct we take a snapshot. >We use the information we have in the registry on 30 September 2011. thank you for the information. I would still like an answer to the following questions: a) are Independent Resources not assigned to the LIR itself included in the category calculation and, if yes, b) what is the justification for this change? I accept your point on LIR-assigned Indepndent Resources and preventing LIRs from getting extra space "on the cheap". Kind Regards, Sascha Luck ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]